Maleic Anhydride–Grafted Polymers:
PP, PE & Compatibilisers Guide
MAH-g-PP · MAH-g-PE · Reactive extrusion · Glass-fibre composites · PA6/PP alloys · Multilayer films
🔗 View Maleic Anhydride Product Page📋 Table of Contents
- Why Graft MAH onto Polyolefins?
- Grafting Chemistry: Radical Mechanism
- Reactive Extrusion Process Variables
- MAH-g-PP: Properties and Commercial Grades
- MAH-g-PE: Properties and Commercial Grades
- Application 1: Glass Fibre–Reinforced PP Composites
- Application 2: PA6/PP Polymer Alloys
- Application 3: Multilayer Packaging Film Tie-Layers
- Other Applications: WPC, Cellulose, Metal Adhesion
- MAH Quality Requirements for Grafting
- Frequently Asked Questions
🤔 1. Why Graft MAH onto Polyolefins?
Polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) are the world's highest-volume polymers - cheap, lightweight, and chemically inert. That inertness is also their limitation: plain polyolefins cannot bond to glass fibres, polar polymers (nylon, polyester), metals, or most substrates because they have no functional groups. Maleic anhydride grafting solves this problem by installing reactive anhydride groups on the polyolefin backbone without fundamentally changing its mechanical character.
🔑 The Compatibility Problem - and How MAH Grafting Solves It
- PP + glass fibre → poor adhesion; delamination under load
- PP + PA6 blend → two immiscible phases; brittle, weak parts
- PE layer on nylon packaging → peels apart at low force
- PP + wood filler (WPC) → no bonding; poor impact resistance
- Anhydride groups react covalently with –NH₂ on glass fibre sizing → strong interfacial bond
- Anhydride reacts with PA6 chain ends → in-situ block copolymer at interface → stable alloy morphology
- Anhydride bonds to nylon substrate → peel strength 5–10× higher
- Anhydride esterifies cellulose –OH → bonded WPC interface
🔬 2. Grafting Chemistry: Radical Mechanism
MAH grafting onto polypropylene or polyethylene proceeds through a free-radical mechanism initiated by organic peroxide decomposition in a twin-screw extruder. The mechanism involves three elementary steps: hydrogen abstraction from the polymer backbone, MAH addition to the resulting macroradical, and radical quenching to give the pendant anhydride group.
⚗️ Radical Grafting Mechanism - Step by Step
2 R–O· (alkoxy radical)
(180–220°C; t½ = seconds)
R–OH + PP–CH·
(tertiary C–H of PP preferred)
PP–CH(MAH·)
(MAH adds across its C=C)
PP–CH(MAH) [pendant anhydride]
via H-abstraction or termination
⚠️ Critical side reaction in PP grafting - β-scission (chain degradation): The tertiary macroradical formed on PP in Step 2 can undergo β-scission - breaking the C–C bond adjacent to the radical site - instead of adding MAH. This cleaves the PP backbone and reduces molecular weight. In grafting with higher peroxide concentrations or at higher temperatures, β-scission competes severely with MAH addition, leading to a lower MW grafted product with reduced mechanical properties. This is why MAH concentration (high MAH = more competition for radicals = suppresses β-scission), peroxide type and level (low peroxide = less β-scission), and temperature profile (lower T = slower peroxide decomposition = more controlled grafting) are the three key process variables that must be balanced in MAH-g-PP reactive extrusion. PE does not undergo β-scission under these conditions - this is one reason MAH-g-PE retains its molecular weight better than MAH-g-PP.
🏭 3. Reactive Extrusion Process Variables
| Process Variable | Typical Range | Effect on Grafting Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| MAH loading ⭐ | 0.5–2.0 wt% on polymer | Higher MAH = higher grafting degree (GD); also suppresses PP β-scission by consuming radicals before chain cleavage occurs. Too high (>3%) = MAH oligomer homopolymerisation as by-product |
| Peroxide type & level | DCP or DHBP at 0.05–0.15 wt%; Lupersol 101, Trigonox B | Higher peroxide = more radicals = more grafting sites BUT more β-scission; must optimise; DHBP (2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di-(t-butylperoxy)hexyne-3) preferred for PP due to higher T₁/₂ compatibility |
| Extruder temperature | 180–220°C (barrel zones) | Higher T = faster peroxide decomposition = faster radical generation = more grafting and more β-scission; zone profile optimised to match peroxide t½ with residence time in reactive zone |
| Screw speed & configuration | 150–400 rpm; co-rotating TSE | Higher mixing intensity = better dispersion of MAH in polymer melt = more uniform grafting; kneading blocks in screw configuration improve radical mixing; venting required to remove MAH vapour after reactive zone |
| MAH feed method | Pre-blended with pellets or liquid injection into melt | Pre-blend (solid MAH + pellets in tumbler) is most common for small-scale; liquid injection via side feeder gives more uniform distribution and allows independent MAH rate control |
| Venting / devolatilisation | Atmospheric vent or vacuum vent downstream of reactive zone | Essential - removes unreacted MAH vapour, MAH oligomers, and peroxide decomposition products; without venting, residual MAH causes off-gassing during downstream compounding and produces irritating fumes |
🔵 4. MAH-g-PP: Properties and Commercial Grades
| Base polymer | Homopolymer PP or random copolymer PP |
| MAH grafting degree (GD) | 0.3–1.5 wt% MAH on PP |
| MFI (melt flow index) | 20–200 g/10 min (230°C/2.16 kg) - higher MFI than base PP due to β-scission |
| Melting point | ~160–165°C (same as PP base) |
| Appearance | White/off-white pellets or powder |
| Anhydride detection | FTIR: 1,780 + 1,850 cm⁻¹ bands |
| Typical use level | 1–5 wt% in compounding formulation |
| Brand | Supplier | GD (wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| Fusabond P Series | DuPont/Dow | 0.2–1.0 |
| Exxelor PO Series | ExxonMobil | 0.3–0.5 |
| Polybond Series | Addivant | 0.5–1.6 |
| Orevac CA Series | Arkema | 0.3–1.0 |
| Chinese generic | Various | 0.5–1.5 |
Many compounders produce MAH-g-PP in-house using MAH (from Sinolook) + base PP + peroxide in their own extruder, avoiding the premium of branded compatibiliser grades.
| Parameter | Low GD (0.3%) | High GD (1.2%) |
|---|---|---|
| Interfacial adhesion | Moderate | Excellent ↑ |
| MW / MFI | Higher MW; lower MFI | Lower MW (β-scission) |
| Stiffness of composite | Slightly lower | Higher ↑ |
| Impact strength | Better (higher MW base) | Lower (MW loss) |
Optimal GD for most GF-PP composite applications is 0.5–0.9 wt% - balancing adhesion improvement with minimal MW degradation.
🟢 5. MAH-g-PE: Properties and Commercial Grades
| Property | MAH-g-HDPE | MAH-g-LLDPE | MAH-g-PP |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-scission during grafting | None ✅ | None ✅ | Significant ⚠️ |
| Grafting efficiency | Moderate | High ↑ | High |
| Flexibility | Stiff | Flexible ↑ | Rigid |
| Tie-layer use | Good | Excellent ↑ | Limited |
| Typical MAH GD | 0.5–1.0% | 0.5–2.0% | 0.3–1.5% |
| Brand | Type | Key use |
|---|---|---|
| Fusabond E Series | HDPE/LLDPE | Tie-layer; WPC |
| Bynel Series | LLDPE/EVA | Multilayer film tie-layer |
| Orevac IM Series | LLDPE | Tie-layer; polar substrate adhesion |
| Plexar Series | Various PE | Coextrusion barrier films |
MAH-g-LLDPE (linear low-density PE) is the preferred tie-layer resin for coextruded barrier packaging because its flexibility matches the multilayer film structure. MAH-g-HDPE is used where stiffness is needed (rigid containers with nylon barrier layer).
🏗️ 6. Application 1: Glass Fibre–Reinforced PP Composites
Glass fibre–reinforced polypropylene (GF-PP) is the single largest application for MAH-g-PP. It is used in automotive parts (bumper beams, door modules, front-end modules), household appliance housings, and structural components where a lightweight, stiff material is needed at lower cost than glass-filled nylon.
Glass fibres in GF-PP composites are sized with a chemical surface treatment - typically an aminosilane coupling agent (e.g., 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES). This leaves –NH₂ groups exposed on the glass fibre surface. When MAH-g-PP is present in the melt during compounding, the pendant anhydride groups react with these surface –NH₂ groups:
PP–CH(CO–NH–[glass])–COOH
(covalent amide/imide bond formed)
This covalent bond across the PP/glass interface dramatically improves load transfer between the stiff glass fibres and the PP matrix.
| Property | No compatibiliser | +3% MAH-g-PP |
|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | ~70 MPa | ~95 MPa ↑35% |
| Tensile modulus | ~3,500 MPa | ~5,200 MPa ↑49% |
| Notched Izod impact | ~45 J/m | ~80 J/m ↑78% |
| Flexural strength | ~110 MPa | ~145 MPa ↑32% |
| Failure mode | Fibre pull-out | Fibre fracture |
- Front-end modules: 30–40% GF-PP replaces steel stampings; weight saving 40–60%; MAH-g-PP at 3–5 wt% loading
- Bumper beams / energy absorbers: 30% GF-PP; stiffness and toughness balanced by MAH-g-PP level
- Door modules and underbody shields: 20–30% GF-PP; cost-performance optimisation
- Instrument panel carriers: High MAH-g-PP loading (4–5%) for maximum stiffness in thin-wall parts
- Engine compartment components: Heat-stabilised 30–40% GF-PP compounds; MAH-g-PP + antioxidant package
🔗 7. Application 2: PA6/PP Polymer Alloys
PA6/PP (nylon 6/polypropylene) blends combine the low cost and moisture resistance of PP with the toughness, printability, and barrier properties of PA6. Without compatibilisation, the two polymers are thermodynamically immiscible - they phase-separate into large, poorly bonded domains with inferior mechanical properties. MAH-g-PP acts as a reactive compatibiliser that builds an in-situ PA6-co-PP block copolymer at the interface during melt blending.
🔬 Reactive Compatibilisation Mechanism - PA6/PP with MAH-g-PP
H₂N–[PA6 chain end] →
PP–CH(CO–NH–PA6)–COOH
(amide bond; fast at 220°C)
- Impact strength 3–5× uncompatibilised
- Tensile strength +20–40%
- Fine PA6 phase improves barrier to O₂ and moisture
- Better paintability vs pure PP
🎬 8. Application 3: Multilayer Packaging Film Tie-Layers
Modern food packaging films commonly use 5–11 layer coextrusion to combine the barrier properties of EVOH or nylon with the seal properties and economics of polyethylene. Because PE and nylon are immiscible, a functional tie-layer adhesive - typically MAH-g-LLDPE or MAH-g-EVA - is required between them.
| Film Structure | Tie-Layer Type | Application & Peel Strength Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| PE / tie / EVOH / tie / PE | MAH-g-LLDPE or MAH-g-EVA | Oxygen-barrier flexible packaging for meat, cheese, snacks; requires peel strength >500 g/in² |
| PE / tie / Nylon / tie / PE | MAH-g-LLDPE | Thermoformable vacuum-skin packaging for fresh meat; nylon layer provides puncture resistance |
| PP / tie / EVOH / tie / PP | MAH-g-PP | Rigid barrier containers (trays, cups) for dairy and deli products; retort-sterilisable |
| HDPE / tie / Nylon | MAH-g-HDPE | Fuel tanks (automotive multi-layer blow-moulded HDPE/nylon barrier structure for permeation compliance) |
🌿 9. Other Applications: WPC, Cellulose, Metal Adhesion
WPC decking, fencing, and automotive interior panels use PP or HDPE as the polymer matrix with 50–70% wood flour or natural fibre (bamboo, flax, jute). MAH-g-PP or MAH-g-PE at 1–4 wt% loading compatibilises the hydrophilic wood surface (–OH groups) with the hydrophobic polyolefin. The anhydride groups esterify the wood cellulose surface –OH groups, creating covalent bonds across the interface. Result: flexural modulus increases 40–80%; water uptake decreases 30–50%; dimensional stability improves significantly.
Natural fibre-reinforced PP (flax-PP, hemp-PP, sisal-PP) for automotive door panels and package trays uses MAH-g-PP as the coupling agent - same anhydride-to-cellulose –OH bonding mechanism as WPC, but applied to longer fibres. Natural fibre composites with MAH-g-PP compatibilisation achieve tensile strengths of 60–90 MPa at 30% fibre loading - competitive with short GF-PP on a specific strength basis, with lower density and better end-of-life recyclability.
MAH-g-PP improves bonding between PP and inorganic fillers whose surfaces carry –OH groups: calcium carbonate (CaCO₃, talc, kaolin), magnesium hydroxide (flame retardant), and barium sulphate. In talc-filled PP (5–20% talc for stiffness and dimensional stability), 1–2% MAH-g-PP increases flexural modulus and reduces brittleness by improving the polymer-filler interface. Magnesium hydroxide (MDH) flame-retardant PP compounds require MAH-g-PP at 2–4% to maintain acceptable impact strength at the 50–60% MDH loadings needed for V-0 rating.
🔬 10. MAH Quality Requirements for Grafting
| MAH Parameter | Grafting Grade Spec | Why It Matters for Grafting |
|---|---|---|
| Purity (MAH%) ⭐ | ≥99.0% | Higher purity = more reactive anhydride available per gram; maleic acid impurity adds –COOH to the system but cannot graft efficiently; reduces grafting degree per unit MAH fed |
| Particle size / form ⭐ | Fine flakes or powder | Uniform dispersion of MAH in PP/PE pellet blend before extrusion is critical; large MAH crystals or chunks cause uneven grafting; fine flakes or micropowder (<200 μm) give best pre-blend uniformity |
| Moisture content | Low (dry, sealed bags) | Moist MAH converts to maleic acid before grafting; maleic acid does not graft effectively; reduces GD; produces steam in extruder that causes splay defects in extrudate; keep bags sealed until use |
| Crystallisation point | ≥52.5°C | Primary purity indicator - use as quick QC test before each production campaign; batch with crystallisation point <52°C should not be used for grafting without investigation |
| Iron (Fe) | ≤5 ppm | Fe can catalyse unwanted radical reactions during extrusion; less critical for grafting vs UPR (colour not a primary concern in opaque compounds), but Fe >10 ppm may affect colour of natural (unpigmented) GF-PP |
💡 In-house MAH-g-PP production economics: A polymer compounder producing MAH-g-PP using Sinolook MAH at ~$2,200/MT, DCP peroxide at ~$4,500/MT, and commodity PP at ~$900/MT can produce MAH-g-PP at a raw material cost of approximately $1,000–1,200/MT - versus buying branded MAH-g-PP (Fusabond, Polybond) at $3,000–5,000/MT. For a mid-scale compounder producing 2,000 MT/year of GF-PP compound at 3% MAH-g-PP, this translates to 60 MT/year of compatibiliser and a raw material saving of ~$100,000–200,000/year by producing in-house. The calculation requires validating grafting degree by FTIR and ensuring consistent QC - using consistently pure, dry MAH from a qualified supplier like Sinolook Chemical is the foundation of consistent in-house MAH-g-PP quality. Visit our product page at sinolookchem.com/…/maleic-anhydride.html for full specifications and to request a sample.
❓ 11. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAH-g-PP) and what is it used for?
Maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAH-g-PP, also written PP-g-MAH or MAPP) is polypropylene on whose backbone pendant cyclic anhydride groups have been installed by free-radical reactive extrusion. The grafting process involves melt-mixing polypropylene pellets with maleic anhydride (0.5–2.0 wt%) and an organic peroxide initiator (0.05–0.15 wt%) in a co-rotating twin-screw extruder at 180–220°C. The peroxide generates carbon radicals on the PP backbone (by hydrogen abstraction); these radicals add across the MAH C=C double bond, installing a pendant anhydride group on the PP chain. The grafting degree (GD) - typically 0.3–1.5 wt% MAH - determines the density of anhydride functionality. MAH-g-PP is used in three main application families: (1) as a coupling agent in glass fibre–reinforced PP composites (GF-PP), where the anhydride groups bond covalently to aminosilane sizing on glass fibres, improving tensile strength by 30–50% and impact strength by 50–80%; (2) as a reactive compatibiliser in PA6/PP polymer alloys, where the anhydride reacts with PA6 chain-end amine groups to build an in-situ block copolymer at the interface, reducing PA6 domain size and improving mechanical properties; and (3) as a coupling agent in wood-plastic composites (WPC) and natural fibre composites, where the anhydride esterifies cellulose –OH groups on fibre surfaces. Most large automotive polymer compounders produce MAH-g-PP in-house using MAH (from chemical suppliers like Sinolook) in their reactive extrusion lines, rather than buying branded compatibiliser grades, significantly reducing raw material costs.
Q2: How do I measure the grafting degree of MAH-g-PP?
The grafting degree (GD) of MAH-g-PP - the weight percentage of MAH successfully grafted onto PP - is most commonly measured by FTIR spectroscopy and acid-base titration: (1) FTIR method (rapid, qualitative to semi-quantitative): Press a thin film of the MAH-g-PP sample at ~200°C. Record FTIR spectrum; look for the characteristic cyclic anhydride doublet at 1,780 and 1,850 cm⁻¹. Quantify by comparing the area ratio of the anhydride peak (1,780 cm⁻¹) to a reference PP peak (1,460 cm⁻¹ CH₂ bend or 2,722 cm⁻¹ CH stretch). Calibrate against samples of known GD from titration. This is the standard QC method in most compounding operations - quick (15 minutes), requires no solvent, and reliably distinguishes grafted anhydride from free MAH residue (which can be removed by washing with methanol); (2) Titration method (quantitative, absolute): Dissolve 1–2 g MAH-g-PP in hot xylene; add a known excess of primary amine (typically n-butylamine or aniline) to convert all anhydride groups to amide/amic acid; back-titrate the excess amine with standardised HCl to determine the total anhydride equivalents. GD (wt%) = (anhydride equivalents × 98.06 g/mol) / sample weight × 100. This is the reference method for accurate GD determination - typically run quarterly or when verifying a new batch of MAH.
Q3: Why does PP degrade (lose MW) during MAH grafting but PE does not?
The molecular weight loss during MAH grafting of PP (but not PE) is due to a β-scission side reaction that is unique to the tertiary carbon radical formed on polypropylene. In PP grafting, the peroxide generates a radical on a tertiary carbon (every other carbon in PP is a tertiary –CH– with three carbon substituents). This tertiary macroradical can either add MAH (desired) or undergo β-scission - breaking the C–C bond adjacent to the radical to form a shorter PP chain and a terminal alkene. PP's tertiary radical is intrinsically more prone to β-scission than secondary radicals because the resulting alkyl radical and alkene are both stabilised by substitution. In contrast, HDPE and LLDPE have only secondary carbon radicals (–CH₂– with two carbon substituents). Secondary radicals are much less prone to β-scission because the resulting primary radical would be higher energy. Therefore, MAH-g-HDPE and MAH-g-LLDPE retain their molecular weight much better than MAH-g-PP. In practice, MAH-g-PP has a higher melt flow index (MFI) than the base PP - typically 2–10× higher - due to β-scission reducing average chain length. This is actually beneficial in some applications (better flow for thin-wall injection moulding of GF-PP parts) but detrimental in others (impact resistance suffers at very high MFI). The β-scission rate can be minimised by: using higher MAH concentration (competes with scission for the radical), lower peroxide level, lower temperature profile, and shorter extruder residence time.
Q4: What is the typical MAH loading used in glass fibre–reinforced PP and PA6/PP blends?
For glass fibre-reinforced PP (GF-PP) composites, the MAH-g-PP compatibiliser is typically used at 2–5 wt% of the total compound weight. For a compound containing 30% glass fibre and 70% polymer matrix, a typical formulation is: 65–67% base PP, 3–5% MAH-g-PP (1.0% GD), 30% glass fibre (chopped strand, 10 μm diameter, aminosilane-sized). Higher MAH-g-PP loading increases stiffness and strength up to an optimum (~4–5%), beyond which excess MAH-g-PP acts as a diluent with no additional compatibilisation benefit. For PA6/PP alloys, the MAH-g-PP level depends on the PA6 content and target morphology: at 20–30% PA6 in PP, typically 5–8 wt% MAH-g-PP (0.7–1.0% GD) is used to fully compatibilise the PA6 droplet phase; the MAH-g-PP loading is approximately stoichiometric with the PA6 amine end group concentration - if PA6 has 40 μeq/g amine end groups and is used at 25% in the blend, approximately 10 μeq/g anhydride equivalents must be provided by the MAH-g-PP to fully react with all PA6 chain ends. This stoichiometric approach is the most rigorous method for determining the required MAH-g-PP loading.
Q5: Can I produce MAH-g-PP in-house and what MAH grade should I use?
Yes - producing MAH-g-PP in-house in a reactive extrusion line (twin-screw extruder, L/D ≥36) is technically straightforward and economically attractive for compounders with sufficient volume (typically ≥500 MT/year of compound requiring compatibiliser). The process: dry-blend PP pellets with MAH flakes (0.5–1.5 wt%) and peroxide (0.05–0.10 wt% DCP or DHBP) in a tumble blender; feed the blend to the twin-screw extruder at 180–220°C barrel temperature; include a vacuum vent downstream of the reactive zone to remove unreacted MAH and peroxide decomposition products; pelletise and QC test (FTIR grafting degree, MFI, crystallisation point of residual MAH <0.5%). For the MAH grade, use standard grade (purity ≥99.0%, crystallisation point ≥52.5°C, moisture-free, fine flakes). Low colour is not critical for opaque GF-PP or natural fibre applications. The most important parameters are: consistent purity (affects GD consistency), uniform particle size (affects pre-blend dispersion), and dry storage (prevents maleic acid formation that reduces grafting efficiency). Sinolook Chemical supplies standard MAH in 25 kg PE-lined bags, 500 kg big bags, and on request as fine powder for improved pre-blend distribution - contact sales@sinolookchem.com or WhatsApp 0086 18150362095 to discuss grafting-grade specifications for your application.
Source MAH for Reactive Extrusion & Grafting - Standard Grade
Contact Sinolook Chemical
MAH CAS 108-31-6 · Purity ≥99.0% · Crystallisation point ≥52.5°C · Fine flakes & micropowder available
25 kg bags · 500 kg big bags · REACH OR ✅ · TSCA cert ✅ · Class 4.1 DG docs · 50+ countries